An aging workforce + poorly executed exercises + pre-existing conditions = a workers' compensation disaster waiting to happen
Every morning, thousands of construction crews, warehouse workers, and manufacturing teams gather in parking lots and break rooms for their daily "stretch and flex" routine.
It feels safe. It looks proactive. Management loves it because it shows they care about injury prevention.
But here's what nobody is talking about: That well-intentioned five-minute routine could be the most expensive liability sitting in your safety program right now.
America's workforce is older, sicker, and more medically fragile than ever before. When you combine mandatory pre-shift exercises with this reality, you're not preventing injuries—you're creating compensable workers' compensation claims.
The average age of skilled tradespeople in construction, manufacturing, and heavy industry is climbing rapidly. Many of your most experienced workers are in their 50s and 60s.
These workers often have:
When you mandate that 58-year-old ironworker with a bulging L4-L5 disc to perform deep trunk twists and toe-touches before his shift, you're not warming him up—you're lighting the fuse.
Most stretch and flex programs are not designed by licensed physical therapists, sports medicine physicians, or kinesiologists. They're often:
Copied from YouTube videos
Implemented by well-meaning but unqualified supervisors
Never vetted by medical professionals
Applied universally without individual assessment
The Result?
Workers with zero flexibility are forced into ballistic stretches. Employees with shoulder impingement are told to do overhead reaches. People with lumbar stenosis are bending and twisting before their bodies are ready.
According to the CDC, 60% of American adults have at least one chronic disease, and 40% have two or more.
This means your workforce likely includes:
Every single one of them is a potential compensable injury waiting to happen the moment they participate in your mandatory stretch routine.
Here's the scenario that plays out in workers' compensation courts every single week:
Day 1: A 54-year-old equipment operator shows up to work. He's been living with mild lower back pain for years (degenerative disc disease, though it's never been formally diagnosed).
6:55 AM: The site superintendent leads the crew through the daily stretch routine. "Bend down and touch your toes. Hold it. Now twist left, twist right. Good. Now reach up high."
7:00 AM: During the trunk twist, the operator feels a sharp pop in his lower back. Pain shoots down his leg. He winces but finishes the stretch because it's mandatory.
7:05 AM: He reports to his supervisor. "I think I hurt my back during stretch."
Day 2: He files a workers' compensation claim.
The injury occurred on company property during a company-mandated activity
It happened during work hours, before the official start of the shift but as part of required pre-work protocol
Participation was not voluntary—it was a company policy
The worker reported the injury immediately and can identify the exact moment it occurred
There may be witnesses who saw him grimace or stop mid-stretch
The Aggravation Argument
Even if the worker had a pre-existing condition (and most do), workers' compensation law in most states follows the "aggravation rule": if a work activity aggravates, accelerates, or combines with a pre-existing condition to cause injury or disability, it's compensable.
Immediate Medical Treatment
Emergency room visit, MRI, specialist referrals: $5,000–$15,000
Ongoing Treatment
Physical therapy, pain management, injections: $20,000–$50,000
Lost Time / Wage Replacement
If the worker is off for 6–12 months: $30,000–$60,000
Permanent Partial Disability Award
Common in back injury cases: $50,000–$150,000
Vocational Rehabilitation
If they can't return to their prior role: $25,000–$75,000
Legal Fees & Defense Costs
If the case goes to hearing: $15,000–$50,000
Total Potential Cost Per Claim:
$145,000 – $400,000+
And that's just one claim. If you have 200 employees doing daily stretches, how many claims are you one awkward twist away from?
Stretch and flex programs became popular in the 1990s and early 2000s when the workforce was younger and healthier. The 45-year-old worker in 2000 is not the same as the 55-year-old worker in 2025 with metabolic syndrome, pre-diabetes, and 30 years of wear on their joints.
Many companies require workers to sign a waiver acknowledging they're participating voluntarily. This provides almost zero legal protection.
Why waivers fail:
The evidence is weak at best. While some studies suggest stretching may reduce certain types of soft tissue injuries, there's limited peer-reviewed evidence that mandatory group stretch programs actually prevent workplace injuries in heavy industry.
What does reduce injuries: proper ergonomic design, adequate staffing, equipment maintenance, task rotation, and workforce competency verification.
Some insurers push stretch and flex programs as part of loss control. But if that program creates claims instead of preventing them, your Experience Modification Rate (EMR) will spike—and your premiums will follow.
Ask your carrier: "How many stretch-related workers' comp claims have you seen in the past five years?" The answer might surprise you.
If you're serious about injury prevention without creating compensable workers' comp claims, here's the smarter approach:
Offer stretching as an optional wellness activity—not a mandatory pre-shift requirement.
If it's truly voluntary, you reduce (but don't eliminate) compensability risk.
If you insist on having a stretch program, hire a licensed physical therapist or occupational health specialist to:
Instead of stretching theater, invest in proven injury prevention strategies:
Ergonomic Tools & Equipment
Adequate Staffing Levels
Task Rotation Programs
Preventive Maintenance
Skills-Based Training
Competency Verification
If you continue your stretch program, create an ironclad paper trail:
Stretch and flex programs were created with good intentions. But good intentions don't win workers' compensation hearings.
In 2025, with an aging workforce, skyrocketing rates of chronic disease, and poorly designed exercise routines being led by unqualified supervisors, these programs have become massive liabilities disguised as safety initiatives.
Every mandatory stretch is a gamble. Every trunk twist on a 55-year-old body with degenerative discs is a coin flip. Every overhead reach by someone with rotator cuff damage is a potential six-figure claim.
And when that claim hits, the cost won't just be financial—it'll impact your EMR, your insurance premiums, your reputation, and your ability to retain skilled workers.
The question isn't whether stretch and flex programs can cause million-dollar claims.
The question is: How many claims will it take before you stop?
Want to reduce injuries without creating compensable claims?
Focus on competency, not calisthenics. Verify your team's regulatory knowledge with EHSINDEX.
Contact Us